ArticleCurrent medical imaging2026
Comparative Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of OPG and CBCT in the Evaluation of Impacted Mandibular third Molar Proximity to the Mandibular Canal.
Article in Current medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMandibular third molars are the most frequently impacted teeth. The proximity of impacted third molars to the inferior alveolar canal requires particular consideration during extraction. Hence, we aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT and OPG using radiographic signs of Rood and Shebab's and find out the risk of mandibular nerve injury.
methodsA prospective study was conducted in 50 subjects. All patients underwent digital OPG evaluation based on Winter's classification of impacted teeth and Rood and Shehab's classification of seven radiographic signs. Cases with any positive finding were examined using CBCT to assess the positioning of the mandibular canal and alveolar ridge.
resultsHorizontal and mesioangular impactions were at higher risk of inferior alveolar nerve damage (p< 0.01 and p < 0.05) along with lingual position of canal (p<0.001), Darkening of roots, interruption of the mandibular canal (p<0.001), and diversion of the mandibular canal (p< 0.04) were associated with a higher risk of damage during extractions. DISCUSSION: The current study confirmed that horizontal and mesioangular impactions showed a significant association with the absence of cortication between the mandibular canal and third molar roots, indicating a high risk of nerve injury, similar to other studies. Also, CBCT has been proven to be the best imaging modality owing to its high diagnostic accuracy.
conclusionIn the current study, CBCT was considered the gold standard, and diagnostic accuracy was higher than OPG. There was fair agreement about the mesioangular and horizontal impaction and their proximity to the mandibular nerve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.