ArticleBMC research notes2026
Effects of training modalities on physiology, hematology, and performance in elite Ethiopian distance male athletes.
Article in BMC research notes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Training variability and threshold density: a conceptual comparison of East African and Norwegian endurance training systems.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the physiological, hematological, and performance adaptations resulting from sequential blocks of endurance (EnT), speed (SpT), and strength (StT) training in elite Ethiopian middle- and long-distance male runners. Using a quasi-experimental repeated-measures design with a fixed order (EnT → StT → SpT), twenty male athletes (23.7 ± 3.2 years; 3000–10000 m events) completed three 6-week training blocks. Physiological (estimated VO₂max, resting heart rate, running economy), hematological (hemoglobin, hematocrit, Red blood cell count (RBC), White blood cell count (WBC)), and performance measures (400 m speed, 5000 m time trial, 12-minute Cooper test) were assessed pre- and post-intervention using paired T-tests and repeated-measures ANOVA.
resultsThe endurance training block produced significant improvements in aerobic and hematological parameters, including estimated VO₂max (+ 6.20 ml·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹), resting heart rate (− 3.80 bpm), and hematocrit (+ 4.35%) (all p < 0.001). Subsequent strength and speed training blocks were associated with gains in running economy (StT: −4.2% oxygen cost, p < 0.01; SpT: −1.8%, p < 0.05) and 400 m speed (StT: −1.21 s, SpT: −1.00 s; both p < 0.001). All training modalities contributed to improved 5000 m times (EnT: −18 s, p < 0.01; SpT: −9 s, p < 0.01; StT: −6 s; p < 0.05). The sequential training approach resulted in complementary improvements across aerobic, anaerobic, and neuromuscular domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.