ArticleBMC health services research2026
Explaining informal patient payments through gaps in governance - a comparative assessment of health system governance in three European countries.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInformal patient payments remain a problem in many European health care systems, and poor health system governance is recognized as a key factor driving their persistence. This study aimed to assess health system governance in selected European countries, with a particular focus on factors relevant to informal patient payments.
methodsTo evaluate health system governance, an assessment instrument was developed based on the TAPIC framework, which covers five governance domains – Transparency, Accountability, Participation, Integrity, and Capacity. Available literature was used to identify aspects within the five governance domains that are relevant to informal patient payments. The content validity of the developed instrument was confirmed through a review conducted by external academic experts. The instrument was subsequently applied to three European countries, namely, Denmark, Greece, and Poland, selected for their differing prevalence of informal patient payments, with national legislation serving as a primary source of data.
resultsIn Poland, and more prominently in Greece, where informal payments are more common, gaps in health system governance are more pronounced compared to Denmark. Shortcomings were identified across all governance domains, including both the absence of adequate legal frameworks and mechanisms as well as their poor execution in practice. These deficiencies are closely linked to informal patient payments or contribute to their underlying causes. They include poorly defined quality and waiting time guarantees, the absence of systems to monitor and incentivize quality of care, poor transparency regarding permissible patient payments, as well as weak accountability mechanisms that only penalize payments proven to be bribes.
conclusionsWhile informal patient payments are recognized as a multi-causal phenomenon, effective health system governance may play a critical role in reducing these payments, though factors beyond governance cannot be neglected. Our results indicate that long-term and short-term strategies are necessary to target the root causes of informal patient payments as well as the payments themselves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.