Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41935306›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Explaining informal patient payments through gaps in governance - a comparative assessment of health system governance in three European countries.

Marzena Tambor, Paraskevi Koufopoulou, Despoina Andrioti Bygvraa, Leena Eklund Karlsson, Sofie Buch Mejsner

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marzena TamborDepartment of Health Economics and Social Security, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 8 Skawinska Street, Krakow, 31-008, Poland. marzena.tambor@uj.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7970-6919
Paraskevi KoufopoulouDepartment of Economics, Laboratory of Health Economics & Management, School of Economics, Business & International Studies, University of Piraeus, 80 Karaoli & Dimitriou Street, P.O. Box 185 34, Piraeus, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2889-0290
Despoina Andrioti BygvraaDepartment of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Box 469, Göteborg, 405 30, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9355-3004
Leena Eklund KarlssonUnit for Health Promotion Research, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Degnevej 14, Esbjerg, 6705, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2052-0989
Sofie Buch MejsnerDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Alle 2, Aarhus, 8000, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4662-513X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInformal patient payments remain a problem in many European health care systems, and poor health system governance is recognized as a key factor driving their persistence. This study aimed to assess health system governance in selected European countries, with a particular focus on factors relevant to informal patient payments.

methodsTo evaluate health system governance, an assessment instrument was developed based on the TAPIC framework, which covers five governance domains – Transparency, Accountability, Participation, Integrity, and Capacity. Available literature was used to identify aspects within the five governance domains that are relevant to informal patient payments. The content validity of the developed instrument was confirmed through a review conducted by external academic experts. The instrument was subsequently applied to three European countries, namely, Denmark, Greece, and Poland, selected for their differing prevalence of informal patient payments, with national legislation serving as a primary source of data.

resultsIn Poland, and more prominently in Greece, where informal payments are more common, gaps in health system governance are more pronounced compared to Denmark. Shortcomings were identified across all governance domains, including both the absence of adequate legal frameworks and mechanisms as well as their poor execution in practice. These deficiencies are closely linked to informal patient payments or contribute to their underlying causes. They include poorly defined quality and waiting time guarantees, the absence of systems to monitor and incentivize quality of care, poor transparency regarding permissible patient payments, as well as weak accountability mechanisms that only penalize payments proven to be bribes.

conclusionsWhile informal patient payments are recognized as a multi-causal phenomenon, effective health system governance may play a critical role in reducing these payments, though factors beyond governance cannot be neglected. Our results indicate that long-term and short-term strategies are necessary to target the root causes of informal patient payments as well as the payments themselves.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareFinancing, PersonalDenmarkGreeceHumansPolandAssessment instrumentEuropeHealth system governanceInformal patient paymentsTAPIC framework

Identifiers

PMID41935306
PMCPMC13188421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.