ArticleBiology of sex differences2026
Sex differences in dynamic and static measures of brain integration derived from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in Biology of sex differences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex differences in dynamic and static measures of brain integration derived from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging.Biology of sex differences · 2026Article
- Disrupted basal forebrain-cortical connectivity in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: unveiling circuit-level links to cognitive decline.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding the impact of biological sex on the functional organization and dynamics of the brain is crucial for elucidating sex-specific differences in cognitive functions and neuropsychiatric disorders. Systems neuroscience often models the brain as a network of interconnected brain regions with functional connectivity (FC), i.e., the correlation between signal time courses, serving as a measure of connection strength. FC matrices, here derived from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI), define a network graph that can be characterized by its level of module segregation or, inversely, integration. Such parameters can be generated for the full length of the acquired data (static) or for short periods implying dynamically changing brain states. We recently made the interesting observation in a separate study (N = 63) that measures of brain integration and segregation based on dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) data differed between sexes, while graph-based measures based on static FC (sFC) did not, which we investigated in more detail in this study.
methodsWe preregistered a replication of our analysis from the small sample in N = 501 subjects of the Human Connectome Project dataset. We performed cross-sectional comparisons between sexes of the static rs-fMRI graph parameters modularity and global efficiency, as well as the dFC parameters state prevalence, mean dwell time, mean inter-state transition time, and variability derived from a two-state model. Additionally, we explored whether sex differences in 66 cognitive and behavioral parameters are mediated by the FC integration measure with the strongest sex effect.
resultsAll static and dynamic measures of integration/segregation showed higher levels of functional integration in males, with effect sizes up to 0.60 for the dFC parameter prevalence. For three of the 66 explored cognitive and behavioral parameters, we observed that the prevalence of the integrated state mediated the sex difference: dexterity, agreeableness, and self-reported aggression.
conclusionWe found consistent evidence across two datasets that rs-fMRI-based measures of brain integration are increased in males. An exploratory analysis, which requires replication, suggests that such differences mediate personality differences. This study highlights that biological sex differences in brain functional organization may contribute to sex-typical behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.