ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
HoloTrauma 3X Triadic AI Co reasoning for robot assisted emergency maxillofacial reconstruction.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Maxillofacial trauma accounts for 8-12% of emergency department visits. Temporomandibular joint injuries and complex facial fractures are common causes of airway emergencies. Presently, no protocols exist to simultaneously evaluate airway patency, skeletal integrity, or occlusal function. We created HoloTrauma 3X, which uses vision-language models to comprehensively evaluate the occlusion-bone-airway triad in emergency settings. Evaluating HoloTrauma 3X on 8427 trauma patients, integrating publicly available datasets from 12 institutions and clinical data from three participating hospitals across three continents, resulted in an average absolute error of 0.42 mm for the maxilla and 0.38 mm for the mandible; 31.4% less time to complete the operation compared to standard techniques; and 42.3% fewer complications during surgery compared to conventional methods.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.