ArticleScientific reports2026
Exercise self-efficacy of physically disabled students of Lemo district primary school.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physical activity is vital for the health and wellness of every child, but students with physical disabilities frequently encounter different challenges that impact their participation. This research aimed to explore the factors affecting exercise self-efficacy among physically disabled students in primary schools. Using a mixed-method approach, a purposive sample of n = 152 students from grade 5 to 8 was selected across five public primary school in the Lemo district. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that age (β = 0.062, t = 7.500, p < 0.05) and gender (β = 0.046, t = 3.500, p < 0.05) were significant predictors of exercise self-efficacy. Additionally, socioeconomic status (β = 0.073, t = 3.571, p = 0.001), peer support (β = 0.231, t = 3.750, p < 0.05), parental support (β = 1.021, t = 4.253, p < 0.001), teachers support (β = 0.084, t = 3.750, p < 0.05), and school administrative support (β = 0.277, t = 3.500, p = 0.001) had a significant positive effect. Totally these factors explained 86.9% of the variance in exercise self-efficacy. Qualitative analysis revealed that critical role of support systems but also face challenges such as insufficient training, lack of adapted equipment, and limited awareness among teachers, peers, parents, and school administrations. Our finding suggest that include comprehensive teacher training in inclusive education, development of peer support program, parental engagement through workshop, school accessibility audit and allocation of resource for adapted equipment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.