ArticleScientific reports2026
A machine learning based framework for predictive school management using student and faculty analytics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
New technologies in education have created a huge amount of data that, when used effectively, can have a major impact on the functioning of an institution and the academic achievement of students. Nevertheless, all existing predictive models are still disconnected and do not integrate historical trends, student-faculty relationships, and trend patterns into a coherent decision-making system. The paper describes an integrated machine learning system that integrates several synergistic AI technologies: (1) deep learning systems (LSTM, GRU, CNN, and Transformers) to model academic growth over time; (2) comprehensible gradient boosting ensembles (XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost) to understandably infer and analyze structured data. (3) graph convolutional networks (GCNs) to encode academic relationships between students, professors, and courses; and (4) data-centric oriented approaches (multitasking, transfer, and federated learning). The framework is tested on two UCI benchmark datasets (n = 649) with fully isolated holdout sets using strict nested cross-validation to prevent data leakage. The framework yields 99.6% and 97.5% predictive accuracy (5.6% and 6.3% improvement over the top baselines) and high recall (99.4% and 96.7%) in classifying at-risk students. Each component has been shown to contribute fully in ablation studies, and the hybrid framework has been shown to outperform state-of-the-art transformed table models (TabTransformer, FT-Transformer, and SAINT) (99.6% vs. 97.2% for the best transformer). Robustness analysis with feature noise and missing data (> 96% accuracy with 20% missing data) demonstrates excellent regression. Fairness assessment indicates that gender and age bias are very small, and mitigation strategies (reweighting, adversarial debiasing) bring the parental education gap down to 0.1%. Cross-domain experiments (mathematics/Portuguese) show a performance loss of -2.3%, indicating internal generalizability, but cross-institutional validation remains to be performed. This framework provides educators with interpretable, actionable insights into evidence-based interventions, demonstrating that for accurate, fair, and robust predictive educational analytics, multi-paradigm AI integration is essential and comprehensive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.