ArticleScientific reports2026
Development and evaluation of a mobile assisted pedagogical model to enhance academic enthusiasm learning and collaboration in EFL contexts.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mobile phone technology has gained increasing attention in education; however, its systematic pedagogical application in high school English as a foreign language (EFL) instruction remains underexplored. This study designed, validated, and evaluated a mobile-assisted pedagogical model aimed at enhancing academic enthusiasm, collaborative learning, and English language achievement among high school learners. A sequential exploratory mixed-methods design was adopted. In the qualitative phase, model development was informed by a systematic literature review and expert consultation. In the quantitative phase, the model underwent an expert-based content evaluation, and its instructional effects were subsequently examined using a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design. The sample comprised 450 10th-grade female students, randomly assigned to experimental (n = 225) and control (n = 225) groups. Instruments included a curriculum-aligned language proficiency test, a collaborative learning questionnaire, and an academic enthusiasm scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and ANCOVA. Results indicated that the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group in academic enthusiasm, collaborative learning, and English learning outcomes. The findings highlight the potential of mobile-assisted pedagogy to foster motivation, structured interaction, and sustained language learning. The study contributes a validated instructional framework grounded in sociocultural, self-determination, and cognitive load theories. Practical implications include integrating mobile-based activities into lesson planning, providing teacher training for technology-enhanced pedagogy, and ensuring equitable access to digital tools. Future research should examine long-term effects, gender comparisons, and the applicability of the model across diverse cultural and curricular contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.