Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41935148›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A distributed fusion framework for breast cancer recurrence prediction using MapReduce.

Prachi Shahare, Abha Mahalwar, Aniket K Shahade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Prachi ShahareDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Yeshwantrao Chavan College of Engineering (YCCE), Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Abha MahalwarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, IBSM University, Chhura, Chhattisgarh, India.
Aniket K ShahadeSymbiosis Institute of Technology, Pune Campus, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India. aniket.shahade@sitpune.edu.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer recurrence remains a major clinical challenge, significantly influencing long-term survival and treatment planning. Accurate early prediction is hindered by heterogeneous clinical factors, imbalanced datasets, and the distributed nature of medical records stored across hospitals, registries, and laboratories. To address these challenges, this study proposes a MapReduce-aligned hybrid framework that combine with distributed Spark-based Gradient Boosted Trees, denoising autoencoder (AE)-derived latent representations, calibrated XGBoost, and deep tabular framework (FT-Transformer and TabTransformer). The framework is designed to operate efficiently on heterogeneous, large-scale datasets while preserving data locality. Two benchmark datasets; the SEER breast cancer recurrence cohort and the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer dataset were used to evaluate framework performance across clinical data. Experimental results show that the proposed calibrated XGBoost and AE-augmented fusion frameworks obtained superior discrimination, calibration with the Wisconsin dataset reaching ROC-AUC values of 0.9954 and MCC ≥ 0.981. On the SEER dataset, characterized by high heterogeneity and sparse recurrence signals, the fusion framework attained improved recall, while calibrated XGBoost offered the best overall balance between precision and stability. The findings demonstrate that combining tree-based embedded feature selection, latent AE compression, and transformer-based contextual frameworking yields consistent performance gains. Moreover, the Spark-GBT integration ensures scalability and suitability for multi-institutional environments where data centralization is restricted. The experimental results show that the proposed fusion framework provides competitive performance compared to strong baseline frameworks such as calibrated XGBoost, and improved recall and robustness for minority-class recurrence prediction. The results indicate that fusion learning improves sensitivity and framework stability, whereas calibrated XGBoost provides the strongest overall discrimination performance. The proposed framework presents a reliable, scalable, and clinically meaningful solution for individualized recurrence-risk prediction.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAutoencoderBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsFemaleHumansPrediction AlgorithmsBig-data healthcare analyticsBreast cancer recurrenceFeature representation learningFusion ensemble learningImbalanced clinical dataMapReducePrognostic prediction

Identifiers

PMID41935148
PMCPMC13212666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.