SynthesisEye (London, England)2026
Macular and retinal manifestations following COVID-19 vaccinations: a 2025 update systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Eye (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An increasing number of reports have linked COVID-19 vaccination to ocular complications, including retinal vascular occlusions, inflammatory disorders, and neuro-ophthalmic events. However, the spectrum and temporal associations of these ocular complications are not adequately understood. This study aims to characterise the types of retinal and macular complications, evaluate latency patterns, and assess the associations with COVID-19 vaccination from 2020 to 2025. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies reporting retinal or macular complications post-COVID-19 vaccination were searched via Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Extracted data included study demographics, outcome, latency, and vaccine subtype. The risk of bias was assessed, and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled relative risk of ocular complications following vaccination. A total of 173 studies were included, with the most frequently reported outcome being retinal vascular occlusions (n = 107). The distribution of ocular complications was significantly different between COVID-19 vaccine and infection exposure (p = 0.014). Most complications occurred within the first month of exposure, particularly among mRNA vaccines, which had a significantly different adverse event rate across vaccine platforms (p = 0.0084). A meta-analysis resulted in a pooled relative risk of 2.40 (95% CI: 0.33-17.73) for retinal vein occlusion following vaccination; however, due to the uncertainty around the estimate, the association remains inconclusive. These findings support considering COVID-19 vaccination as a potential differential cause for patients with retinal vascular occlusions, highlighting the need for continued vaccine safety and surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.