Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41935125›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

CLGDS: robust bridge crack detection with YOLO enhanced feature fusion and SIoU optimization.

Bao Jiao, Xiao Canjun, Guo Dong, Wang Chenyu, Peng Mi, Zhao Xinping

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bao JiaoInstitute of Mine Intelligence, Chengdu Technological University, Chengdu, 610031, China.
Xiao CanjunInstitute of Mine Intelligence, Chengdu Technological University, Chengdu, 610031, China. canjunxiao@cdtu.edu.cn.
Guo DongChina Southwest Architectural Design and Research Institute Corp. Ltd, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Wang ChenyuInstitute of Mine Intelligence, Chengdu Technological University, Chengdu, 610031, China.
Peng Mi *Institute of Mine Intelligence, Chengdu Technological University, Chengdu, 610031, China.
Zhao Xinping *Institute of Mine Intelligence, Chengdu Technological University, Chengdu, 610031, China.

Funding

Sichuan Provincial Education Science Planning Program SCJG24A003-1The Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology Program 23ZDYF0110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a key indicator of structural integrity and in-service performance, crack detection is essential for the condition assessment and preventive maintenance of bridges. To address the challenges of detecting cracks with various scales and shapes under low-contrast backgrounds in bridge inspection tasks, this paper proposes a robust detection method named CLGDS. It is based on YOLO11 with enhanced feature fusion and SIoU loss optimization, which effectively improves the accuracy and robustness of crack identification. The proposed framework includes three key innovations. (1) A Cross Stage Partially Large Separable Kernel Attention (C2LSKA) module is integrated in the backbone network to enhanced the representation of crack features in the case of morphologically diverse and complex background interference. (2) A Gathering and Distributing (GD) mechanism serves as the neck network, facilitating multi-scale feature fusion and improving the detection performance for cracks of varying scales and geometrically irregular edges. (3) A Scylla-IoU (SIoU) loss function is introduced to replace the commonly used Complete IoU (CIoU) loss. By explicitly incorporating directional sensitivity and multi-scale adaptability, SIoU effectively mitigates angle-dependent misalignment during bounding box regression. Experimental results demonstrate that CLGDS achieves a mean average precision (mAP@50) of 93.5%, outperforming YOLOv5, YOLOv8, and YOLO11 by margins of +1.5%, +0.6%, and +1.2%, respectively. Furthermore, it attains a mAP@50-95 of 68.5%, significantly higher than that of YOLOv5 (61.3%), YOLOv8 (62.6%), and YOLO11 (65.3%). These results validate the effectiveness of CLGDS in accurate bridge crack detection, providing a solid technical foundation for automated structural health monitoring and preventive maintenance.

Identifiers

PMID41935125
PMCPMC13212570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.