ArticleScientific reports2026
CLGDS: robust bridge crack detection with YOLO enhanced feature fusion and SIoU optimization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-Time Interface-Opening Detection for Nickel Starting Sheet Pre-Stripping Based on an Improved YOLO11n.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As a key indicator of structural integrity and in-service performance, crack detection is essential for the condition assessment and preventive maintenance of bridges. To address the challenges of detecting cracks with various scales and shapes under low-contrast backgrounds in bridge inspection tasks, this paper proposes a robust detection method named CLGDS. It is based on YOLO11 with enhanced feature fusion and SIoU loss optimization, which effectively improves the accuracy and robustness of crack identification. The proposed framework includes three key innovations. (1) A Cross Stage Partially Large Separable Kernel Attention (C2LSKA) module is integrated in the backbone network to enhanced the representation of crack features in the case of morphologically diverse and complex background interference. (2) A Gathering and Distributing (GD) mechanism serves as the neck network, facilitating multi-scale feature fusion and improving the detection performance for cracks of varying scales and geometrically irregular edges. (3) A Scylla-IoU (SIoU) loss function is introduced to replace the commonly used Complete IoU (CIoU) loss. By explicitly incorporating directional sensitivity and multi-scale adaptability, SIoU effectively mitigates angle-dependent misalignment during bounding box regression. Experimental results demonstrate that CLGDS achieves a mean average precision (mAP@50) of 93.5%, outperforming YOLOv5, YOLOv8, and YOLO11 by margins of +1.5%, +0.6%, and +1.2%, respectively. Furthermore, it attains a mAP@50-95 of 68.5%, significantly higher than that of YOLOv5 (61.3%), YOLOv8 (62.6%), and YOLO11 (65.3%). These results validate the effectiveness of CLGDS in accurate bridge crack detection, providing a solid technical foundation for automated structural health monitoring and preventive maintenance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.