ArticleScientific reports2026
A generic compact model for resistive memories and switches.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most previous studies have modeled resistive switching based on physical principles. While physics-driven models provide valuable physical insight, their complexity and device specificity limit scalability and often result in high computational costs in large-scale circuit simulations. To address these limitations, we propose a generic compact modeling methodology in LTspice. This generalized approach constructs compact models for diverse resistive memory technologies using a minimal set of common circuit elements. It integrates nonlinear resistors, capacitors, and switches to reproduce key switching phenomena-including filament formation, polarization-modulated tunneling, and spin-dependent resistance-thereby capturing the essential behaviors of RRAM, TS, FTJ, and MRAM. This generalized framework enables flexible parameter tuning to reflect each device's distinct switching dynamics. Validation using experimental and reference data confirms that the resulting models accurately reproduce the key switching characteristics across all four device classes. Monte Carlo simulations further demonstrate the framework's ability to capture variability arising from parameter fluctuations and cycling effects. The proposed framework scales seamlessly from single-device operation to array-level simulation, enabling performance evaluation of SNN- and BNN-based inference systems and supporting accurate estimation of power consumption. Collectively, these results demonstrate the framework's broad applicability and scalability for large-scale neuromorphic and in-memory computing architectures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.