Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41935097›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Sympatric Lepus spp. in the central Italian Alps host significantly different gut microbiotas.

Lara Marinangeli, Barbara Crestanello, Nadine Praeg, Theresa Rzehak, Julia Seeber, Paul Illmer, Francesco Nonnis Marzano, Heidi C Hauffe, Giulio Galla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lara MarinangeliConservation Genomics Research Unit, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, S. Michele all'Adige, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-1579-4148
Barbara CrestanelloConservation Genomics Research Unit, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, S. Michele all'Adige, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1610-8692
Nadine PraegDepartment of Microbiology, Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1531-8543
Theresa RzehakDepartment of Microbiology, Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-6270-4735
Julia SeeberInstitute for Alpine Environment, EURAC Research, Bozen, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0189-7377
Paul IllmerDepartment of Microbiology, Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3368-3015
Francesco Nonnis MarzanoDepartment of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5764-3515
Heidi C Hauffe *Conservation Genomics Research Unit, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, S. Michele all'Adige, Italy. heidi.hauffe@fmach.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3098-8964
Giulio Galla *Conservation Genomics Research Unit, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, S. Michele all'Adige, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4573-0897

Funding

Euregio Tirolo-Alto Adige-Trentino Interregional Project Network IPN94National Biodiversity Future Centre (NBFC) CN_00000033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mountain hare (Lepus timidus) is an arctic-alpine species with relictual populations in the Italian Alps, typically occurring at elevations above 2000 m a.s.l. This species is threatened by habitat loss and fragmentation, and declining snow cover due to climate warming. Moreover, as treelines shift upward, the European brown hare (L. europaeus) is expanding its distribution into areas previously dominated by the mountain hare, potentially leading to resource competition, and loss of local adaptation through hybridization and inter-specific gene flow. In particular, the consequences of sympatry on diversity and composition of prokaryote and fungal communities of the gut microbiota, which are critical to individual health, are currently unknown. Here, we compared the gut microbiota of these two hare species in an area of overlap in the central Alps by analysing fresh faecal pellets collected from Val Mazia/Matschertal, Italy along an elevational gradient (1000 to 2500 m a.s.l.). For the first time, we describe the prokaryote diversity and composition of L. timidus, and the fungal gut communities (mycobiota) of both Lepus species. Species identity was confirmed for 95 samples via mtDNA barcoding, while gut microbiota richness and composition were investigated using amplicon sequencing, targeting the V3-V4 region of the prokaryote 16S rRNA gene and fungal ITS2 regions. Distinct prokaryote and fungal communities were observed for each species, even where their distributions overlap, indicating differences in their functional diversity. Interestingly, for both Lepus species, elevation influenced fungal but not prokaryote diversity. Therefore, sympatry appears to have had minimal impact on gut microbiota composition of either species thus far. Given the expected upward range shift of L. europaeus under climate warming and its continued restocking for hunting, our findings provide an important baseline for assessing the health and adaptability of L. timidus as well as the effectiveness of conservation efforts aimed at protecting this species. However, expanding this research to other areas of sympatry will be essential to understand if gut microbiota composition is indicative of L. timidus conservation status across its range.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeHaresSympatryAnimalsBiodiversityDNA, MitochondrialEcosystemFecesFungiItalyPhylogenyDNA, Mitochondrial16S rRNA geneITS2Lepus europaeusLepus timidusMetataxonomymtDNA

Identifiers

PMID41935097
PMCPMC13195074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.