Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41935087›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Mapping of fermionic lattice models for Ising solvers.

Lakshya Nagpal, Aditya Kumar, S R Hassan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lakshya NagpalInstitute of Mathematical Sciences, CIT Campus Tharamani, Chennai, 600113, India. lakshyan@imsc.res.in.
Aditya KumarIndian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune, Pune, Maharashtra, 411008, India.
S R HassanInstitute of Mathematical Sciences, CIT Campus Tharamani, Chennai, 600113, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present an end-to-end, symmetry-aware pipeline that converts interacting fermionic and quantum-spin models into annealer-ready QUBOs while preserving low-energy physics. The workflow combines Bravyi-Kitaev encoding, exact [Formula: see text] symmetry tapering, Xia-Bian-Kais (XBK) diagonalization to a Z-only form, and [Formula: see text] local quadratization, with ground energies recovered via a Dinkelbach fixed-point over the resulting Ising objective. We validate the approach across a complexity ladder: (i) a frustrated 2D Ising model run on a D-Wave Advantage QPU reproduces the known ferromagnet-stripe transition; (ii) finite-temperature checks on 1D Ising recover standard finite-size trends; (iii) a genuinely quantum spin target (XXZ) matches exact diagonalization (ED) on small chains; and (iv) interacting fermions (t-V) in 1D (rings [Formula: see text]) show ED-level energies and the expected kink near [Formula: see text], with a 2D [Formula: see text] cluster tracking ED slopes up to a uniform offset. A replication-factor study quantifies the accuracy-overhead trade-off, with [Formula: see text]-of-magnitude error reduction by and diminishing returns beyond [Formula: see text] Except for the classical Ising benchmark and Molecular benchmarks, experiments use D-Wave's public DIMOD and Neal simulators; a molecular benzene case in the appendix illustrates portability beyond lattices. The results establish a practical pathway for mapping quantum matter to current annealers, with clear knobs for fidelity, resources, and embedding.

Indexed as

Fermionic embeddingQuantum algorithmsQuantum computingStrongly correlated systems

Identifiers

PMID41935087
PMCPMC13201532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.