ArticleNature communications2026
Common and distinct neural correlates of social interaction processing and theory of mind in narratives.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Common and distinct neural correlates of social interaction processing and theory of mind in narratives.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Neural mechanisms underlying decisions to express or suppress emotions.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Social interaction processing and theory of mind (ToM) frequently co-occur, but their commonalities and distinctions at behavioral and neural levels remain unclear. Participants (N = 231) provided moment-by-moment ratings of four text and four audio narratives on social interactions and ToM engagement, which were reliable (split-half r = 0.98 and 0.92, respectively) but only modestly correlated (r = 0.32). In a second sample (N = 90), we analyzed the co-variation between social interaction and ToM ratings and fMRI activity during text and audio narratives. Activity maps associated with social interaction processing and ToM generalized across text and audio (spatial r = 0.60 and 0.58, respectively) and overlapped in canonical ToM regions (FDR q < 0.01). ToM uniquely engaged the anterior intraparietal sulcus, right lateral occipitotemporal cortex, and right supplementary motor area. These results suggest that observing social interactions automatically engages canonical ToM regions, even without explicit mentalizing, and ToM additionally engages brain regions related to action understanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.