SynthesisThe pharmacogenomics journal2026
Economic effectiveness of pharmacogenomics-guided prescribing for psychiatric disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in The pharmacogenomics journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pharmacogenomics (PGx)-guided prescribing is a promising approach to reduce variability in drug response, although its cost-effectiveness remains uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the cost-effectiveness of PGx-guided prescribing compared to standard care in psychiatry. In January 2026, we searched MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO for studies published between 2014 and 2025. We included any peer-reviewed study that included adults with a diagnosed psychiatric disorder, comparing PGx-guided prescribing to standard care, and reported both quality-of-life and economic outcomes. Given the lack of consensus on synthesising economic evidence, both a narrative synthesis and meta-analysis were conducted. Pooled incremental net benefit (INB) was used as the effect measure for the meta-analysis and heterogeneity measures including the I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.