ArticleNature communications2026
Repulsion from slow-diffusing nutrients improves microbial chemotaxis towards moving sources.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Competing chemical gradients change chemotactic dynamics and cell distribution.Physical review. E · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemotaxis, or the following of chemical concentration gradients, is essential for microbes to locate nutrients. However, microbes often display paradoxical behaviors, such as Escherichia coli being repelled by several amino acids. Here, we explore chemotaxis towards a moving source and demonstrate that when multiple nutrients are released from the source repulsion from certain nutrients actually improves chemotaxis towards the source. Because a moving source leaves most of the nutrient plume behind it, simply following the concentration gradient results in aiming behind the source and potentially failing to intercept it. However, when attraction to a fast-diffusing nutrient and repulsion from a slow-diffusing nutrient are combined, motion in a new direction emerges and the chance of intercepting the source is increased up to six-fold. We demonstrate that this "differential strategy" is robust against numerous variations, including order-of-magnitude increases in the repellent release rate. Finally, we leverage existing data to show that E. coli is attracted to fast-diffusing amino acids and repelled by slow-diffusing ones, suggesting it may utilize a differential strategy and providing an explanation for its repulsion from these amino acids. Our results thus illuminate new possibilities in how microbes can integrate signals from multiple gradients to accomplish challenging chemotactic tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.