SynthesisNPJ biofilms and microbiomes2026
Bacteria of the lung microbiome and health biomarkers in chronic airway disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in NPJ biofilms and microbiomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- SARS‑CoV‑2 Associated Shifts in the Upper Respiratory Tract Mycobiome in Non-hospitalized Cases.Mycopathologia · 2026Article
- Characteristics of Respiratory Microbiome in COPD-A Literature Review.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2026Review
- The clinical and translational perspectives on the lung microbiome in interstitial lung diseases: a bibliometric review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The lung microbiome is increasingly recognized as a key contributor to the development and progression of chronic airway diseases. While these conditions are typically associated with reduced microbial diversity and pathogen overgrowth, emerging evidence suggests that non-pathogenic bacteria may influence clinical outcomes. However, inconsistent findings across studies have made it difficult to determine their exact role in disease pathophysiology. To identify potentially beneficial members of the lung microbiome, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies investigating the association between non-pathogenic bacterial genera or species and clinico-pathological features in individuals with asthma, bronchiectasis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cystic fibrosis. For the meta-analysis, data from different diseases were combined. Our analysis revealed that several bacteria in the lung microbiome were significantly associated with improved lung function and/or reduced airway inflammation across diseases. Although causal relationships cannot be established due to the absence of interventional studies, our findings highlight promising candidates for functional characterization and therapeutic exploration. Considerable heterogeneity in study design and reporting underscores the need for standardized methods and validation in relevant experimental models to advance our understanding of the lung microbiome in chronic airway diseases and inform the development of effective microbiome-based interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.