Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41934674›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of public health2026

COVID-19 and its short- and long-term effects on the operations of the EMA: fostering innovation in the EU during and beyond time of crisis.

Laura Gillini, Clotilde Sevilla-Hernández, Marco Cavaleri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura GilliniUnit B2, Directorate General of Health and Food Safety, European Commission, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Clotilde Sevilla-HernándezUnit B2, Directorate General of Health and Food Safety, European Commission, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-0745-5281
Marco CavaleriPublic Health Threats Department, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) played a crucial role in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic by implementing various innovations that facilitated the development and approval of vaccines and treatments. This article analyses some of those innovations on the agency's operations through literature on innovation in the public sector using a literature review, publications on EU policy along with internal knowledge by the authors. The agency's innovative approaches such as the establishment of the COVID-19 Emergency Task Force and the effective use of real-world evidence enabled the agency to provide rapid advice to developers and ensure the provision of scientific feedback to the authorities and the public during crisis. The changes implemented led to new legislation allowing long-term effects within the agency. The EMA has emerged from the COVID-19 pandemic strengthened by innovative approaches leading to new legislation enabling an expanded mandate of the agency. To sustain innovation at the EMA, the agency might have to consider a structured and comprehensive approach to innovation, including the importance of fostering an innovation culture within the organization.

Indexed as

COVID-19Government AgenciesPandemicsEuropean UnionHumans

Identifiers

PMID41934674
PMCPMC13050264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.