ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Safety of the use of an absorbable implant in breast-conserving surgery followed by radiotherapy: preplanned interim results from a prospective study.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05941299 (A Pivotal Study of REGENERA Implant in Malignant Breast Lesion Treated by Lumpectomy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Pivotal Study of REGENERA Implant in Malignant Breast Lesion Treated by Lumpectomy
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oncoplastic techniques aim to optimize cosmetic and oncologic results after BCS. Absorbable scaffolds may aid volume replacement while preserving radiotherapy (RT) planning and follow-up imaging, though clinical evidence remains limited. This interim analysis of a prospective, multicenter, single-arm trial (Tens-BBC/003/2021; NCT05941299) included 25 patients with 6 month follow-up after BCS and whole-breast RT. Outcomes were adverse events (AEs), device usability, pain (VAS), satisfaction, quality of life (BREAST-Q©), cosmetic and imaging results, and RT tolerance. Mean age was 53.6 years, BMI 24.8 kg/m2. Tumors were mainly in the upper-outer quadrant (52%); T1c in 56%, T1b in 20%, T2 in 24%. Histology was invasive ductal carcinoma in 72%, nodal status cN0 in 96%. Mean surgery time was 74.7 min; drains were used in 76%. REGENERA™ type A (70 mL) was implanted in 84%, type B (100 mL) in 16%. No major complications occurred. Of 94 AEs within 90 days, all were mild/moderate and unrelated to the device; four later AEs (in one patient) were possibly implant-related. Investigator satisfaction (VAS) improved from 8.4 at implantation to 9.2 at 6 months; usability targets were exceeded. Pain decreased from 2.3 to 1.56. BREAST-Q© showed higher breast satisfaction (+ 8.9, p = 0.041), reduced distress (–10.3, p = 0.006), and a modest decline in physical well-being (–11.6, p = 0.012). All patients completed RT; acute toxicity occurred in 44%, all grade 1–2. Cosmetic outcomes were good to excellent in 88%. Radiological integration was satisfactory, with no significant interference in MRI. REGENERA™ is safe, feasible, and biocompatible for volume replacement in BCS. It provides high satisfaction and favorable cosmetic results without compromising RT or follow-up imaging. Early results support its integration into oncoplastic practice, though long-term evaluation is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41934598What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.