SynthesisBiodegradation2026
Fungal bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons in terrestrial environments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Biodegradation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Petroleum hydrocarbon (PH) contamination in terrestrial environments is a serious global concern due to the toxicity and persistence of these compounds. Fungi are promising agents in bioremediation because of the ability to tolerate, degrade and metabolize complex and recalcitrant PHs. However, the use of other organisms, such as bacteria, remains more prevalent. Here, we evaluated the extent to which fungi have been investigated in PH bioremediation through a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. Among the 1,749 studies selected on bioremediation, only 348 included fungi, of which 97 met the inclusion criteria for quantitative analysis. Fungi were included in less studied (20% of articles) than bacteria and plants (63% and 31% respectively). However, our meta-analysis revealed that fungal treatments significantly reduced residual hydrocarbons by 50-60% in comparison with controls, with filamentous fungi (e.g., Trametes, Peniophora) showing the highest efficacy. Mycorrhizal fungi also demonstrated notable reduction (45-49%), while yeasts were less effective, particularly for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). We further identified that experimental variables, including treatment duration and the type of contaminated matrix, significantly influenced hydrocarbon reduction efficiency. Key limitations in the literature included a strong bias toward filamentous fungi and PAHs, as well as inconsistencies in experimental methodologies. Overall, our findings highlight the significant potential of fungi as bioremediation agents and emphasize the need to expand research on complex hydrocarbon mixtures (e.g., fuels) and underrepresented fungal groups, such as yeasts and mycorrhizal fungi, to better understand their role in reducing PH contamination in terrestrial ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41934537What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.