Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41934535›Full record

ArticleAmbio2026

Towards a more just post-coal future: Engaging local communities in post-mining landscape restoration through participatory mapping methods.

Lucia Brisudová, Bohumil Frantál

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lucia BrisudováDepartment of Geography, Faculty of Science, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Bohumil FrantálDepartment of Geography, Faculty of Science, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic. bohumil.frantal@upol.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3999-4447

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky 23-07382S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although energy transition policies are expected to adhere to the principles of procedural, distributive, recognition, and restorative justice, there remains a significant gap in both practice and research regarding public participation in post-mining land-use planning. Using a case study of a closing open-cast mine in Most district, Czech Republic, drawing on responses from 101 local residents, we demonstrate the efficacy of combining a participatory mapping approach with statistical and spatial analysis to engage local stakeholders in the research. It also highlights the importance of integrating community perspectives and interests into landscape assessment and post-mining land-use planning. Adoption of the approaches and methods presented in this study can enable post-mining regeneration planners to understand better the sense of place, landscape values, and needs of local communities. This, in turn, can foster place-making on post-mining sites, help prevent land-use conflicts, and contribute to more just post-coal development.

Indexed as

Coal MiningCommunity ParticipationConservation of Natural ResourcesMiningCzech RepublicHumansJust transitionLandscape restorationParticipatory mappingPost-mining land-useProcedural justice

Identifiers

PMID41934535
PMCPMC13661869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.