ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2026
Identification of potential inhibitors of 3‑mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase with a deep-learning based screening of natural products.
Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
3-Mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (3-MST), a key enzyme in sulfur metabolism, has recently gained attention as a potential anticancer target. However, reported 3-MST inhibitors remain limited, motivating the exploration of new scaffolds such as natural products. In this study, a library of 3744 natural products was virtually screened against human 3-MST using DiffDock (diffusion-model-based docking) followed by AutoDock Vina docking. Top-ranking candidates were further analyzed via molecular dynamics simulations and Molecular Mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area binding free energy calculations. Methylophiopogonanone A (4), Daphnoretin (5), and L-asarinin (9) exhibited stable binding with favorable energetics, displaying binding free energies comparable to the reference ligand 7NC301. Binding mode analyses revealed that Methylophiopogonanone A primarily engaged in hydrophobic interactions, whereas Daphnoretin and L-asarinin formed extensive polar contacts, accompanied by higher desolvation penalties. In vitro cytotoxicity assays showed that Methylophiopogonanone A and L-asarinin reduced HCT116 cell viability by 40.3% and 26.3% at 25 µM, which is consistent with their inhibitory of 3-MST with IC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.