ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Developing an artificial intelligence tool for detecting fractures of child abuse: preliminary findings.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reply to the letter to the Editor: Caution in interpreting early performance gains in AI detection of inflicted fractures in children.European radiology · 2026Article
- Letter to the Editor: Caution in interpreting early performance gains in AI detection of inflicted fractures in children.European radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesApproximately 6.9% of children in the United Kingdom have suffered physical abuse. Fractures are a common sign and must not be overlooked due to high recurrence and mortality rates. We aimed to train and assess the diagnostic accuracy of a deep learning-based artificial intelligence model (BoneView) in detecting inflicted fractures. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis pragmatic retrospective diagnostic accuracy pilot study focuses on children under 5 years old who underwent skeletal survey examinations for suspected physical abuse at a single tertiary centre between 1st January 2000 and 31st December 2023. Radiographs were extracted from the Picture Archiving and Communication System and divided to retrain and test the model. Radiology reports and retrospective review by one observer were used as the reference standard.
resultsOur total dataset included 1740 patients (mean age, 8.77 months ± 8.343 [standard deviation], 1026 males). The model's baseline performance recorded an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.46 (95% CI: 0.38, 0.57), with a sensitivity of 44% (95% CI: 35%, 58%) and a specificity of 61% (95% CI: 52%, 71%). For preliminary model training, 329 of 1227 positive studies were annotated, yielding a revised AUC of 0.55 (95% CI: 0.48, 0.66), sensitivity of 52% (95% CI: 43%, 64%), and specificity of 67% (95% CI: 58%, 78%).
conclusionPreliminary training of a novel AI tool for detecting inflicted fractures yielded improved results from baseline performance. This justifies the completion of annotation and further training of this AI tool to potentially achieve clinically acceptable performance. KEY POINTS: Question Double reporting of skeletal surveys is vital for identifying fractures caused by physical abuse, but some departments lack the expertise to double report these investigations. Findings Preliminary retraining of a commercially available deep learning algorithm using radiographic skeletal surveys led to improved inflicted fracture detection accuracy. Clinical relevance Training this deep learning algorithm using relevant imaging enhances its performance. An accurate tool for automated skeletal survey interpretation may improve outcomes for physically abused children by offering an additional diagnostic opinion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.