Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41934488›Full record

ArticleJournal of psycholinguistic research2026

An Eye-Tracking Study on the Interword Spacing Effect in Arabic.

Tommi Tsz-Cheung Leung, Fatima Boush, Meera Al Kaabi

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tommi Tsz-Cheung LeungDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates. leung@uaeu.ac.ae.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6038-8316
Fatima BoushDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8609-5407
Meera Al KaabiDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7432-6212

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated interword spacing effects on eye movement during Arabic reading, focusing on the distinctive orthographic system of Arabic text. Research on Roman-script languages (e.g., English) concluded that interword spacing facilitates word identification and sentence comprehension (Rayner et al. in Vision Research 38:1129–1144, 1998, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00274-5 ; Slattery et al. in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 22:406–422, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000104 ), whereas studies on other languages could not replicate these results (Bai et al. in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 34:1277–1287, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1277 ). While written Arabic uses interword spaces between words, we showed that manipulating interword spaces did not inhibit reading-related eye movements. However, we found a significant influence of interword spacing on saccadic programming. Overall, the lack of an ‘interword spacing effect’ in Arabic led us to postulate that Arabic orthography might have an important role in guiding saccades despite the absence of interword spacing. Our conclusions are also in line with the proposal that there is an independent level of abstract letter representation of Arabic which encodes allographs and letter positions (e.g., Carreiras et al. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 19:685–690, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0260-8 ).

Indexed as

ComprehensionEye MovementsEye-Tracking TechnologyLanguagePattern Recognition, VisualPsycholinguisticsReadingSaccadesAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAllographyArabicEye movementsInterword spacing effectOrthography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.