Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41934486›Full record

ReviewJournal of psycholinguistic research2026

Diglossia and Orthographic Complexity as Multiplicative but not Additive Challenges in Arabic: A Critical Review.

Ibrahim Asadi, Abeer Asli-Badarneh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ibrahim AsadiDepartment of Learning Disabilities and Special Education, The ArabAcademic College for Education, 22 Hahashmal St, P.O. Box 8340, Haifa, Israel. wwwasadi@gmail.com.
Abeer Asli-BadarnehDepartment of Learning Disabilities and Special Education, The ArabAcademic College for Education, 22 Hahashmal St, P.O. Box 8340, Haifa, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2575-4939

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present review explores how the unique linguistic and orthographic characteristics of Arabic interact to shape the development of literacy in Arabic. The review is based on a systematic synthesis of empirical studies published between 2000 and 2025, including behavioral, developmental, and neurocognitive research on reading, spelling, and comprehension among native Arabic speaking learners, conducted in line with PRISMA guidelines. It focuses on the combined influence of diglossia and the visual and structural complexity of the Arabic script. Drawing on empirical findings from behavioral, developmental, and neurocognitive research, the review shows that these two dimensions do not merely add their effects but interact in a multiplicative way, creating cumulative challenges for beginning readers and for those with reading difficulties. Across the studies reviewed, a consistent pattern emerges showing that this interaction constrains decoding accuracy, reading fluency, and comprehension across developmental stages. These effects are particularly evident in the early phases of literacy acquisition and are amplified among learners with dyslexia or developmental language disorder. The discussion critically examines how universal models of reading fail to account for these interacting sources of difficulty, and argues for a language-specific framework that captures the dynamic relation between phonological, morphological, and orthographic processes in Arabic. From an instructional perspective, the synthesis points to the need for teaching practices that explicitly bridge spoken and standard varieties of Arabic, place greater emphasis on morphological awareness, and provide careful scaffolding as learners transition from vowelized to unvowelized text. The review concludes with implications for theory and pedagogy, emphasizing the need for instructional practices that bridge spoken and standard Arabic.

Indexed as

ArabsComprehensionLanguageLiteracyReadingDyslexiaHumansArabicDiglossiaLiteracyMultiplicative challengesOrthography

Identifiers

PMID41934486
PMCPMC13050341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.