ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2026
Evaluation of maxillary sinus septa and predicted Schneiderian membrane perforation risk: a cone beam computed tomography study.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Morphometric Analysis of the Maxillary Sinus Using CT-Based Air-Cavity Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Retrospective CBCT-based analysis of anatomical and demographic factors in implant planning for the maxillary first molar region.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to characterize the morphology, orientation, and location of maxillary sinus septa in relation to posterior dentition status, and to evaluate the radiographically categorized (predicted) risk of Schneiderian membrane perforation using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
methodsCBCT images from 300 individuals with adequate posterior maxillary visualization were retrospectively analyzed. Images with pathologic formations, prior sinus surgery, or fractures were excluded. The presence, orientation (mediolateral or anteroposterior), and location (premolar anterior, premolar–molar, molar posterior, or multiple) of maxillary sinus septa were recorded. Participants were grouped by posterior dentition status (< 2 teeth or ≥ 2 teeth). Perforation risk was assessed radiographically using a modified seven-class system and categorized as low, moderate, or high. No intraoperative confirmation was performed.
resultsThe mean age of participants was 43.5 ± 13.3 years; 54.7% were male. Septa were mostly mediolateral (91.7%) and located in the premolar region (40.0%). The most frequent predicted risk classes were Class I (33.0%) and Class III (32.7%). Moderate predicted perforation risk was higher in females (p = 0.011), and septum location was significantly associated with predicted perforation risk (p < 0.001). No significant associations were observed between posterior dentition status, septum orientation, and predicted perforation risk.
conclusionsMaxillary sinus septa exhibit variable morphological patterns and anatomical distributions that may be relevant for preoperative CBCT evaluation during sinus floor elevation. Although perforation risk was assessed radiographically and not confirmed intraoperatively, understanding septal morphology may enhance surgical awareness and inform individualized planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41934477What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.