SynthesisThe Indian journal of medical research2026
Prevalence and risk factors of maternal near miss in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in The Indian journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives Maternal near miss (MNM) is a marker of severe maternal complications and reflects the quality of obstetric care systems. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the prevalence of MNM and identify common risk factors among pregnant women in India. Methods In accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines, "MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science" database search was carried out until November 21, 2024. Observational studies from India that detailed the risk factors and prevalence of MNM were included. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the JBI checklist were used to evaluate quality. Prevalence and heterogeneity were determined through meta-analysis using a random-effects model. Results There were 6,606 MNM cases in 39 studies with 242,015 pregnant women. The pooled prevalence of MNM was 3.9% (95% CI: 1.6%-7.2%) with substantial heterogeneity (I2=99.4%). The prevalence of MNM varied between the states, with Rajasthan reporting as low as <1% to West Bengal reporting 38%. Anemia, sepsis, haemorrhage, and hypertensive disorders were the most frequently mentioned risk factors. Interpretation and conclusions The prevalence of MNM varies greatly throughout India. The study emphasizes the necessity of integrating MNM surveillance into national health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.