ReviewThe Indian journal of medical research2026
Clinically actionable alterations in Indian breast cancer patients derived through whole transcriptome sequencing.
Review in The Indian journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives Genomic studies are essential for identifying mutations that may influence key aspects of breast tumours, such as susceptibility, aggressiveness, and response to treatment. There are deficient molecular and genomic data from Indian breast cancer patients. Methods mRNA from primary breast cancer samples were subjected to next-generation transcriptome (mRNA) sequencing on an Illumina platform, in duplicates and triplicates to generate 30-60 M reads/sample. PAM50, and absolute intrinsic molecular subtyping (AIMS) gene expression-based classifiers were used for intrinsic subtyping. Variants were called using, GATK, MuTect2, VarScan2, and VarDict, followed by filtering for somatic and non-synonymous changes. Germline variants were excluded using public databases. ClinVar annotations prioritised pathogenic variants, and the STRING algorithm was used for network analysis. Results A total of 207 RNA-Seq datasets from 97 breast cancer patients were analysed. There was good concordance between the immunohistochemical receptor and AIMS classification for all subtypes, but there was discordance between immunohistochemical and PAM50 subtypes within the ER-positive/HER2-positive subgroup, wherein only 38.5% (n= 5) were classified as HER2-like by gene expression classification. Variant analysis identified 145 high-confidence somatic mutations, with TP53 (n=46, 47%) and PIK3CA (n=33, 34%) being the most frequent. Additional actionable mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, FGFR2, PTEN, AKT1, and mTOR pathways were identified. At least one actionable mutation was found in 52% of patients. Fusion transcript analysis identified 91 recurrent fusions, including novel partners with ERBB2, MED1, and CDK12, suggesting the possibility of unique molecular events. Interpretation and conclusions This study demonstrates that Indian breast cancer patients exhibit molecular subtypes and actionable mutations comparable to Caucasian cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.