ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2026
Pain Medicine and the Opioid Crisis: Time to Own Our Responsibility!
Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pain remains a major unmet health need. Rising opioid prescribing has not reduced population pain and has directly contributed to increased morbidity and mortality. Opioid use disorder (OUD) and pain frequently coexist. Many people with OUD experience acute and chronic pain and a substantial proportion of patients prescribed opioids develop OUD. We have contributed to this problem. In this Position Paper, we defend the idea that we must urgently redefine pain medicine as a frontline discipline in opioid use disorder prevention and recovery. Pain management must be reframed as part of the solution for people with or at risk of OUD. Core principles include: early identification of OUD and psychiatric comorbidity, routine incorporation of trauma-informed, stigma-reducing communication and shared decision-making; continuation of opioid agonist therapy during acute care; use of tailored multimodal, opioid-sparing analgesia; and perioperative planning with addiction and primary care follow-up. At a system level, we recommend multidisciplinary opioid stewardship, clear limits on opioid indication, dose and duration, diversion-mitigation strategies and policy changes such as reduced pack sizes and limiting indications for prolonged-released opioids. Research priorities include qualitative studies of lived experience, inclusion of patient-reported outcomes in trials and big-data analyses of prescribing to identify targets for intervention. Integrating clinical best practice, stigma-aware care and system reforms can reduce harm while ensuring equitable, effective pain relief for people with pain and those with or at risk of OUD. SIGNIFICANCE: This position paper synthesises clinical, psychosocial and system-level strategies to manage pain in people with or at risk of OUD. It emphasises our unique responsibility by learning from failures, and constructively sees the future. Treatment continuity, trauma-informed and stigma-reducing communication, integrated care, interdisciplinary coordination and opioid stewardship policies are no longer optional. These recommendations aim to reduce harms, improve pain and mental-health outcomes and guide clinicians and policymakers toward better and more equitable care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.