ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026
Ensemble-based genomic prediction for maize flowering time improves prediction accuracy and reveals novel insights into trait genetic variation.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While various genomic prediction models have been evaluated for their potential to accelerate genetic gain for multiple traits, no individual genomic prediction model has outperformed all others across all applications. As an alternative approach, ensembles of multiple individual genomic prediction models can be applied to utilize the complementary strengths of individual prediction models and offset the prediction errors of each. We used the EasiGP (Ensemble AnalySis with Interpretable Genomic Prediction) pipeline to investigate the performance of an ensemble approach, targeting flowering-time traits measured in 2 maize nested association mapping datasets. For both datasets, the ensemble-based prediction approach achieved higher prediction accuracy and lower prediction error across the flowering-time traits compared to each individual model. Multiple genomic regions known to contain key flowering-time-related genes were repeatedly included as features across individual genomic prediction models, indicating the models successfully captured SNPs as features that are associated with genomic regions known to contain flowering-time genes. Although repeatability was high for some genomic regions, estimated marker effects varied across many genomic regions, suggesting that the models might also have captured different aspects of the genetic variation underlying the traits. The ensemble combination of the diverse views likely contributed to the improvement of prediction performance by the ensemble-based approach over the individual prediction models. Ensemble-based prediction can be applied to overcome limitations observed in the continuous exploration for the best individual genomic prediction models that can consistently achieve the highest prediction performance, thereby potentially contributing to improved prediction accuracy for applications in crop breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.