ArticleBasic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology2026
Understanding Medication Errors Through Patient Complaints in a Danish University Hospital.
Article in Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient complaints are an important source of data, as they may help illuminate medication safety issues from the patient's perspective. We aimed to identify and describe medication errors (MEs) reported in patient complaints and compare them with MEs from safety incident reports. This descriptive hospital-based study (1) compared patient complaints with and without MEs using the Health Complaint Analysis Tool (HCAT) and (2) analysed MEs identified in both patient complaints and incident reports using the standard taxonomy of the reporting system. Of 6301 complaints, 310 (4.9%) were related to MEs. Compared with other complaints, ME-related complaints were more often submitted by family members (ratio 1.6), directed towards nursing staff (ratio 2.5), involved ward-based events (ratio 4.3) and occurred during discharge or transfer (ratio 2.9). Following selection and additional deduplication procedures, 202 MEs were identified in patient complaints. Compared with 8364 MEs from safety incident reports, patient complaints revealed higher proportions of antiepileptic and antipsychotic medication (ratio: 1.9), prescribing errors (ratio: 1.5), wrong medicine errors (ratio: 1.6) and errors with severe or fatal outcomes (ratio: 14.6). Patient complaints may uncover unique MEs not captured by traditional reporting systems. They may serve as a valuable complement to safety incident reports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.