ArticleMedical education2026
From mechanisms to systems: Reconceptualising supervised workplace learning in postgraduate medical education.
Article in Medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From mechanisms to systems: Reconceptualising supervised workplace learning in postgraduate medical education.Medical education · 2026Article
- When systems set the limits of supervision.Medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhy do the same supervisory mechanisms (feedback, observation, entrustment) produce different learning experiences across clinical settings? Current research treats them as discrete behaviours rather than examining how they interact within local contexts. This study uses realist theory to reframe supervised workplace learning as contextually configured systems, examining how key mechanisms (the processes through which attending physicians and residents interact) couple differently across postgraduate clinical settings.
methodsWe conducted a realist-informed multiple case study across four clinical departments in Ireland (Geriatric Medicine, Surgery, Paediatrics and Infectious Diseases). Semi-structured interviews with residents and attending physicians explored everyday clinical work, learning and supervisory dynamics. Analysis proceeded in two phases: (1) within-case, theory-informed inductive analysis using a realist theory on supervised workplace learning as a sensitising concept; (2) cross-case configurational analysis tracing how six mechanisms (entrustment, support seeking, monitoring, modelling, meaning making and feedback) patterned differently by context.
resultsFifty participants (38 residents, 12 attending physicians) were interviewed. All six mechanisms appeared in every setting but were organised into distinct patterns shaped by local conditions. Geriatric medicine: continuous monitoring and narrow entrustment produced high oversight with limited autonomy progression (shaped by patient frailty, strong continuity, containment culture). SURGERY: tightly coupled entrustment-monitoring-feedback drove staged procedural progression (shaped by observable performance, resource scarcity, competitive selection). Paediatrics: fluid, overlapping mechanisms enabled relational negotiation (shaped by family-facing work, small teams and psychological safety). Infectious diseases: fragmented, reactive mechanisms produced discontinuous supervision (shaped by severe discontinuity, high workload, frequent roster changes). What distinguished settings was not mechanism presence but mechanism coupling (how mechanisms reinforced or constrained one another), producing systematically different outcomes. DISCUSSION: Supervision operates as a contextually adapted configuration of interdependent mechanisms, not a set of discrete behaviours. The same mechanisms organise into different patterns depending on local conditions (continuity, patient complexity, resources, culture), producing different learning experiences. These context-dependent patterns (not specialty templates) challenge policies that audit mechanism presence rather than mechanism function, positioning supervision as an emergent practice that requires both enabling structural conditions and skilful pedagogical enactment within those conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.