ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Quantitative prediction of intravenous drug interactions caused by cytochromes P450 inhibitors and inducers.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantitative prediction of intravenous drug interactions caused by cytochromes P450 inhibitors and inducers.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsPharmacokinetic interaction studies typically focus on oral administration, but intravenous (IV) administration bypasses intestinal degradation and hepatic first-pass metabolism, leading to distinct drug-drug interaction (DDI) magnitude. This study aimed to develop a predictive model for DDIs involving IV-administered drugs.
methodsDrugs metabolized by the five major cytochrome P450 enzymes were analysed. Data from IV DDI studies, including area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) ratios of object drugs with and without precipitants, were collected. A Bayesian approach estimated IV contribution ratios (CR) from published oral CR values. Predictions were validated by assessing whether predicted-to-observed ratios fell within 50-200% of observed values.
resultsData for 33 drugs and 87 AUC ratios involving 26 precipitants were analysed. In the training set, 95% of AUC ratios were within the acceptability range, with a mean bias of 0.09 mg·h/L and 16% imprecision. In the validation set, 85% of predictions were within range, with a bias of -0.012 mg·h/L and 27.3% imprecision. Mean AUC ratios for inhibitors were 2.28 (oral) and 1.78 (IV). For inducers, mean AUC ratios were 0.209 (oral) and 0.62 (IV).
conclusionsDespite the limited dataset, the model demonstrated robust performance with 85% of predictions validated. It expands the DDI-predictor framework for quantitative prediction of cytochrome-mediated drug-drug interactions affecting drug exposure to intravenously administered object drugs, thereby providing a tool to predict and understand IV-specific DDIs effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.