ArticleContact dermatitis2026
Skin Sensitisation and Dermatitis Among Epoxy-Exposed Workers in a Wind Turbine Plant: Influence of Occupational Factors.
Article in Contact dermatitis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEpoxy polymers, widely used in industries such as wind turbine production, are common causes of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). However, gaps remain mostly regarding the type of occupational exposure (specific tasks) and protective strategies.
objectivesTo evaluate epoxy resin sensitisation in a wind turbine blade plant and assess its associations with tasks, medical history, clinical patterns, and personal protective equipment (PPE) use.
methodsA cross-sectional study was performed in a large wind turbine blade facility. A group of volunteer workers completed a questionnaire on occupational/medical history, PPE use, and symptoms. Onsite patch testing included the European Baseline-, epoxy-, and isocyanate series. Data were analysed using SPSS and R (p < 0.05).
resultsAmong 131 workers tested (7.4% of the workforce), seven (5.3%), all from high-exposure tasks, showed positive reactions to epoxy compounds: Bisphenol F resin (5), Bisphenol A resin (4), and hardeners/additives (5). Hand dermatitis was the predominant ACD pattern, with a median time to onset of 8 months after employment. No associations were found between sensitisation and previous medical history or PPE compliance.
conclusionsThe ACD to epoxy resin is a significant concern in wind turbine blade manufacturing. Accurate diagnosis requires patch testing with epoxy-specific series, beyond the European Baseline series. Prevention should extend beyond PPE, addressing airborne exposure and cross-contamination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.