ArticleEnvironmental research2026
A two-step Bayesian clustering approach to relate PFAS mixture profiles and dietary patterns in early pregnancy.
Article in Environmental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diet is a major source of exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). However, few studies have investigated dietary patterns in relation to differences observed in the PFAS exposure patterns. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis within the Project Viva cohort of 1383 pregnant women enrolled at their first prenatal visit (1999-2002), who completed a validated food frequency questionnaire (158 items) and had plasma concentrations of six PFAS. We implemented a Bayesian repulsive Gaussian mixture model (BRGM) to identify PFAS exposure patterns. These patterns defined our PFAS subpopulations for a subsequent analysis, where we derived dietary patterns that accounted for differences amongst these subpopulations. Using a robust profile clustering (RPC) model, we detected dietary patterns both across the entire cohort and within specific PFAS subpopulations. The BRGM model identified six PFAS subpopulations with distinct PFAS exposure levels. Across the entire cohort, we identified six dietary patterns, plus one additional local dietary pattern per PFAS subpopulation identified by the RPC model. Notably, we observed clear consumption differences between high- and low-PFAS exposure subpopulations. Subpopulations with higher PFAS concentrations showed greater consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, packaged and processed condiments, decaf coffee (during pregnancy), skim milk, and poultry, while those with lower PFAS concentrations tended to show greater consumption of vegetables, fruits, regular beer (before pregnancy), hot cereal, and sweet baked goods. Our approaches provided novel insights into the relationship between prenatal exposure to PFAS and dietary intake by identifying dietary patterns unique to different PFAS subpopulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.