Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41933615›Full record

ReviewAdvanced drug delivery reviews2026

Towards clinical translation of nanomedicines: Formulation scale-up and model systems.

Owen M Kelly, Andrew R Hanna, Addison K Byrne, Jonathan A Green, Iuri Viotti Perisse, Kevin D Wells, Stephen A Murray, Jie Xu, Y Eugene Chen, Irina A Polejaeva and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Owen M KellyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Andrew R HannaDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Addison K ByrneDivision of Animal Sciences and the National Swine Testing Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Jonathan A GreenDivision of Animal Sciences and the National Swine Testing Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Iuri Viotti PerisseDepartment of Animal, Dairy and Veterinary Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.
Kevin D WellsDivision of Animal Sciences and the National Swine Testing Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Stephen A MurrayThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Jie XuNational Center of Rabbit Models for Translational Research, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Y Eugene ChenNational Center of Rabbit Models for Translational Research, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Irina A PolejaevaDepartment of Animal, Dairy and Veterinary Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.
Alice F TarantalDepartments of Pediatrics and Cell Biology and Human Anatomy, School of Medicine, and California National Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
David IssadoreDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Alexandra S Piotrowski-DaspitDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Internal Medicine-Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Division, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: asapd@umich.edu.

Funding

National Institute on Aging (NIA) ColonyP51OD011107 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Simon J. Atkinson · 2012 to 2026
$191.5M
SCGE Comparative Studies SupplementU42OD027094 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HARTIGAN-O'CONNOR, DENNIS J., SEGAL, DAVID J · 2019 to 2023
$14.2M
Resource ComponentU42OD035737 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Alice F Tarantal · 2023 to 2026
$6.7M
The Jackson Laboratory Gene Editing Testing Center (JAX-GETC)U42OD026635 · OD · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI MURRAY, STEPHEN A · 2018 to 2022
$4.6M
PET/CT for Nonhuman Primate ImagingS10RR025063 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI TARANTAL, ALICE F · 2011 to 2011
$2.1M
miniEXPLORER-II for Total-Body PET Translational ImagingS10OD028713 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI TARANTAL, ALICE F · 2020 to 2020
$1.9M
National Center of Rabbit Models for Translational ResearchR24OD039745 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI YUQING Eugene CHEN, Zachary Thomas Freeman · 2025 to 2026
$1.6M
Developing Gene Editing Therapeutics, Biodegradable Polymeric Delivery Vehicles, and High-throughput Platforms for the Treatment of Cystic Fibrosis- SupplementR00HL151806 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PIOTROWSKI-DASPIT, ALEXANDRA SARAH ANNUKKA · 2023 to 2025
$856k
Nonhuman Primate IVIS Spectrum Imaging SystemS10OD018102 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI TARANTAL, ALICE F · 2014 to 2014
$405k
Ultrasound Imaging for Nonhuman Primate Translational ResearchS10OD016261 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI TARANTAL, ALICE F · 2013 to 2013
$203k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR025063NHLBI NIH HHS R00 HL151806NIH HHS P51 OD011107NIH HHS R24 OD039745NIH HHS S10 OD016261NIH HHS S10 OD018102NIH HHS S10 OD028713NIH HHS U42 OD026635NIH HHS U42 OD027094NIH HHS U42 OD035737
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-viral nanomedicines, including nanoparticles (NPs) composed of lipids and polymers, represent a transformative approach to drug and gene therapy. However, clinical translation of these technologies is limited by two key barriers: the scale-up of NP formulations and the challenge of conducting predictive preclinical studies in relevant animal models. Efficient upscaling of nanomedicines, from cost and material requirement perspectives, requires manufacturing processes that can reliably provide products across the many orders of magnitude of scale from discovery (<mg of product) to large-scale testing (>kg of product). Additionally, initial preclinical studies are often performed in mouse models for discovery; however, mid- to large-size animal models such as rabbits, pigs, sheep, and nonhuman primates are more relevant to human scale and physiology in the context of evaluating the safety, efficiency, and efficacy of therapeutic strategies proposed for use in humans across age groups. This review summarizes some current strategies to scale-up the production of nanomedicines for translational investigations. Animal models and new approach methodologies are also addressed for NP assessment and screening, including the physiological distinctions when comparing rodent models to larger species that can impact NP delivery. Current challenges are also highlighted in terms of scale-up and preclinical validation with the objective of highlighting scalable, effective nanomedicine platforms that can be considered for translation to human trials.

Indexed as

NanomedicineNanoparticlesTranslational Research, BiomedicalAnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansModels, AnimalLipidMacaquesMiceNanoparticlesPigsPolymerRabbitsScale-upSheep

Identifiers

PMID41933615
PMCPMC13394844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.