ReviewAdvanced drug delivery reviews2026
Towards clinical translation of nanomedicines: Formulation scale-up and model systems.
Review in Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Translational Paradox of Cancer Nanomedicine: Biological, Pharmacokinetic, and Manufacturing Barriers to Clinical Success.Biology · 2026Review
- Nanomedicine targeting ECM stiffness: restoring mechanical homeostasis for cancer immunotherapy.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Pre-Target Interception Defines Carbapenem Failure in Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales: A Mechanistic Framework for Spatiotemporal Drug Reprogramming.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-viral nanomedicines, including nanoparticles (NPs) composed of lipids and polymers, represent a transformative approach to drug and gene therapy. However, clinical translation of these technologies is limited by two key barriers: the scale-up of NP formulations and the challenge of conducting predictive preclinical studies in relevant animal models. Efficient upscaling of nanomedicines, from cost and material requirement perspectives, requires manufacturing processes that can reliably provide products across the many orders of magnitude of scale from discovery (<mg of product) to large-scale testing (>kg of product). Additionally, initial preclinical studies are often performed in mouse models for discovery; however, mid- to large-size animal models such as rabbits, pigs, sheep, and nonhuman primates are more relevant to human scale and physiology in the context of evaluating the safety, efficiency, and efficacy of therapeutic strategies proposed for use in humans across age groups. This review summarizes some current strategies to scale-up the production of nanomedicines for translational investigations. Animal models and new approach methodologies are also addressed for NP assessment and screening, including the physiological distinctions when comparing rodent models to larger species that can impact NP delivery. Current challenges are also highlighted in terms of scale-up and preclinical validation with the objective of highlighting scalable, effective nanomedicine platforms that can be considered for translation to human trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.