ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2026
Surgical Outcomes in Partially Accommodative Esotropia Using Augmented Distance-Angle Averaging With and Without Hyperopic Correction.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeUndercorrection is common after standard dosing of medial rectus (MR) recession for partially accommodative esotropia (PAET). Our goal was to evaluate motor and sensory outcomes in patients with PAET undergoing augmented MR recession. STUDY
designInterventional case series.
methodsWe studied patients with PAET who underwent augmented bilateral MR recession targeted to the average distance esotropia with and without hyperopic correction.
resultsA total of 110 patients (47% female) with a mean age of 5 ± 3 years were included. Preoperative distance esotropia measured 42 ± 13Δ without spectacle correction and 25 ± 11Δ with full hyperopic spectacle correction. Surgery was performed for target angles based on Parks' tables. Despite using an augmented target angles that exceeded the deviations measured with hyperopic correction, 33 patients (30%) had >5Δ residual esotropia at final follow-up. Consecutive exotropia developed in 9 patients (8%), of whom 8 (89%) were managed with hyperopic undercorrection. Posterior pulley fixation in 23 patients reduced the mean distance-near disparity from 12 ± 5Δ to 1 ± 4Δ. Only 8 patients (7%) underwent reoperation, 7 for persistent esotropia and 1 for consecutive exotropia.
conclusionsAugmented bimedial rectus recession for PAET, based on a target angle averaging distance esotropia with and without correction, achieved high rates of favorable motor and sensory outcomes. Nevertheless, 30% of patients had residual esotropia, underscoring that even augmented dosing may be insufficient. Rare overcorrections were effectively managed by reducing hyperopic spectacle power.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.