Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41933469›Full record

ArticleThe Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology2026

Foetal Movement Information and Maternal Concerns in the Third-Trimester: Findings of an Aotearoa New Zealand National Survey.

Billie F Bradford, John M D Thompson, Christopher J D McKinlay, Likhit S Dukkipati, George D Cronin, Nimisha Waller, Judith McAra-Couper, Tania Cornwall, Lesley M E McCowan, Robin S Cronin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Billie F BradfordDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0208-7459
John M D ThompsonDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Christopher J D McKinlayDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Likhit S DukkipatiDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
George D CroninHarmonic Analytics, Wellington, New Zealand.
Nimisha WallerCentre for Midwifery and Women's Health Research, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Judith McAra-CouperCentre for Midwifery and Women's Health Research, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Tania CornwallSands Auckland Central, New Zealand.
Lesley M E McCowanDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9915-7873
Robin S CroninDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8304-8004

Funding

Auckland University of Technology Summer StudentshipKo Awatea Tupu Research Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPromoting awareness of foetal movement (FM) is a recognised approach to addressing preventable stillbirth. However, provision of information is inconsistent, and rates of presentation for decreased FM may vary by maternal factors. Information is lacking on maternal views of FM information and knowledge of actions if concerned about FM.

aimsTo describe women's views of FM during late pregnancy in Aotearoa-New Zealand (Aotearoa-New Zealand), including factors that influence maternal actions if concerned. MATERIALS AND

methodsOnline survey of women with singleton third-trimester pregnancies in Aotearoa-New Zealand. Multivariable analysis adjusted for maternal factors.

resultsEligible participants comprised European (1042, 63.5%), Māori (266, 16.2%), Pacific (119, 7.3%), Asian (160, 9.8%) and Other (35, 2.1%). Over half were nulliparous (916, 55.9%) and early third-trimester (median 31, IQR 28-34). Most (1366, 83.3%) had been concerned about FM. Groups that were less likely to seek advice when concerned, included Māori (aOR 0.69, 95% CI 0.51%-0.93%, p = 0.02), Pacific (aOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38%-0.88%, p = 0.01) and parous (aOR 0.73, 95% CI 0.59%-0.90%, p = 0.003) women. Advice seeking was also less likely with a doctor as the main maternity provider (aOR 0.59, 5% CI 0.39%-0.92%, p = 0.02) compared to a midwife, and those who received fewer than recommended antenatal visits (aOR 0.55, 95% CI 0.34%-0.88%, p = 0.01).

conclusionsThis study identified that FM worries are common in the third-trimester in Aotearoa-New Zealand. Yet, some groups of women were less likely to seek advice when concerned, indicating opportunities to reduce inequity and address barriers to accessing care.

Indexed as

Fetal MovementHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePregnancy Trimester, ThirdPrenatal CareAdultFemaleHumansMaori PeopleNew ZealandPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultantenatal carefoetal activityfoetal movementpregnancypregnant women

Identifiers

PMID41933469
PMCPMC13049267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.