Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41933417›Full record

ReviewKnee surgery & related research2026

Artificial intelligence in orthopedics: current applications, challenges, and future directions.

Sang Yoon Kim, Byung Sun Choi, Hyuk-Soo Han, Du Hyun Ro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Knee surgery & related research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sang Yoon KimDepartment of Orthopaedics, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Republic of.
Byung Sun ChoiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Republic of.
Hyuk-Soo HanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Republic of.
Du Hyun RoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Republic of. duhyunro@gmail.com.

Funding

Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea RS-2024-00403047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial intelligence research in orthopedics has grown rapidly, yet a substantial gap remains between technical development and clinical translation. This narrative review summarizes current applications of artificial intelligence in orthopedic practice and highlights barriers to implementation. MAIN BODY: Current work converges on three domains: machine learning for structured perioperative risk prediction, deep learning for standardized musculoskeletal imaging, and large language models for workflow and decision support. Applications such as automated fracture detection, Kellgren-Lawrence grading for osteoarthritis, and transfusion risk modeling are approaching clinical maturity. However, routine adoption is limited by algorithmic opacity, performance degradation in new clinical environments, and poor fit within existing workflows. We argue that progress should shift from increasing model complexity toward rigorous evaluation, including external validation on independent cohorts. In addition, probability calibration and uncertainty estimation are important for trustworthy risk communication. Future directions may include multimodal "digital twin" approaches that integrate electronic medical records, imaging phenotypes, and intraoperative data into patient-specific trajectories.

conclusionsThe clinical impact of artificial intelligence in orthopedics will depend on life-cycle governance and demonstrated net benefit, prioritizing reliability and implementation science over retrospective benchmark performance.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceClinical translationDeep learningExternal validationLarge language modelsMachine learningMusculoskeletal imagingOrthopedicsWorkflow integration

Identifiers

PMID41933417
PMCPMC13047823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.