ArticleAnimal microbiome2026
Optimizing cetacean blow collection methods under controlled conditions: implications for further non-invasive UAV-based sampling of the cetacean respiratory microbiome in the wild.
Article in Animal microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are gaining attention as non-invasive tools for wildlife research, offering the ability to collect biological samples without physically handling animals. In cetaceans, drone-based sampling of exhaled breath condensate—or “blow”—has emerged as a promising method for assessing health, particularly through analysis of the respiratory microbiome. However, standardized protocols for effective and reliable blow collection are still lacking.
resultsThis study aimed to evaluate and compare four different blow collection tools—DNA/RNA Shield, dry and pre-moistened biocide-free cellulose sponges, and indicating FTA cards—using controlled trials conducted 1 m above five bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) under human care. Metabarcoding analyses of the captured microbial communities revealed that the type of sampling collection tool had a stronger influence on microbiome composition and structure than the individual dolphin or sample origin (blow, air, or water). FTA cards and DNA/RNA Shield consistently yielded the most informative and high-quality results. In contrast, both types of sponges showed evidence of overgrowth by copiotroph opportunistic bacteria, limiting their reliability. While DNA/RNA Shield offered superior DNA yield and storage conditions, FTA cards proved to be highly practical due to their ease of use, portability, and cost-effectiveness.
conclusionsThe results underscore the critical role of sampling tool selection in shaping respiratory microbiome profiles obtained via UAV-based blow collection in dolphins. Both DNA/RNA Shield and FTA cards are valid options, with the final choice depending on specific logistical considerations, resource availability, and research priorities. This study provides a foundational step toward standardizing drone-assisted protocols for respiratory microbiome sampling in wild cetaceans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.