ArticleInternational journal of health geographics2026
Using genomic epidemiology and geographic activity spaces to investigate tuberculosis outbreaks in Botswana.
Article in International journal of health geographics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesOur objective was to identify potential ‘hotspots’ of tuberculosis (TB) transmission by integrating pathogen genomic and geospatial data, including activity spaces where transmission may occur (e.g. community locations such as work, school, or social venues) in addition to residential locations.
methodsWe analyzed geographic data collected during 2012–2016 for the Kopanyo Study, a population-based study of TB transmission in Botswana. We included participants with results from whole genome sequencing conducted on archived samples from the original study. We used a spatial log-Gaussian Cox process model to detect core areas of activity spaces belonging to individuals in TB outbreaks (genotypic groups with ≤ 5 single-nucleotide polymorphisms), which we compared to ungrouped participants (those not in a genotypic group of any size).
resultsWe analyzed data for 636 participants, including 70 participants belonging to six outbreak groups with a combined total of 293 locations, and 566 ungrouped participants with a combined total of 2289 locations. Core areas (‘hotspots’) for each outbreak group were geographically distinct, and we found evidence of localized transmission in four of six outbreaks. Hotspots had different geographic characteristics when analyzing activity spaces compared to residential locations alone.
conclusionsThe incorporation of activity spaces in geospatial modeling of genomic data may improve the characterization of potential transmission hotspots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.