ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026
Association of the Albumin-Bilirubin score with 7-day incident delirium risk following bloodstream infection in critically ill adults: evidence from a propensity-weighted cohort.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDelirium is a frequent complication in patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) and is associated with poor outcomes. The albumin–bilirubin (ALBI) score, an evidence-based index of hepatic function and systemic inflammation, has shown prognostic value in sepsis. However, its association with the risk of incident delirium in patients with BSI remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the utility of the ALBI score in stratifying the risk of incident delirium in this population.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database (MIMIC-IV, v3.1) involving adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a first episode of BSI. The primary exposure was the baseline ALBI score, and the primary outcome was incident delirium within 7 days. To rigorously control for confounding, we adopted a doubly robust estimation strategy. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on covariate-balancing propensity scores (CBPS) was applied to maximize the balance of baseline characteristics between groups. Subsequently, multivariable Fine-Gray proportional subdistribution hazard models were employed to estimate subdistribution hazard ratios (sHRs), accounting for death as a competing risk and adjusting for residual confounding using covariates identified via a hybrid feature selection strategy. Additionally, restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was performed to characterize dose–response relationships, and subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate consistency across clinical strata.
resultsA total of 651 patients were included and stratified into low- and high-ALBI groups based on a median cutoff of -1.51. The high-ALBI group had a significantly higher 7-day cumulative incidence of delirium compared to the low-ALBI group (56.4% vs. 44.3%, Gray’s test P = 0.004). In the fully adjusted Fine-Gray model, each 1-unit increase in the ALBI score was independently associated with an increased risk of delirium (sHR 1.80, 95% CI 1.38–2.33, P < 0.001). Categorical analysis confirmed that patients in the high-ALBI group had nearly double the risk (sHR 1.98, 95% CI 1.38–2.83, P < 0.001). RCS analysis revealed a non-linear, J-shaped dose–response relationship. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that these associations remained largely consistent across various clinical strata, with no significant interactions identified (P for interaction > 0.05).
conclusionsHigher baseline ALBI scores are independently associated with an increased risk of 7-day incident delirium in critically ill adults with BSI. Derived from routinely available laboratory tests, the ALBI score may serve as a complementary objective marker for early risk stratification identifying patients who may benefit from preventive interventions, rather than a standalone predictive tool. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.