ArticleBMC emergency medicine2026
Machine learning prediction of hospitalization outcomes in critically Ill emergency department patients transported by ambulance: A Retrospective Single Center Cohort Study.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCritically ill patients transported to the emergency department by ambulance represent a high-risk and clinically heterogeneous population. Early identification of patients requiring hospitalization is essential for effective resource allocation and timely clinical decision-making. This study focused on clinical and laboratory parameters routinely obtained during the early emergency department course.
methodsThis retrospective single-center cohort study included 2,338 adult patients brought to the emergency department by ambulance. Demographic, clinical, and early laboratory parameters obtained shortly after emergency department arrival were used to develop machine learning models predicting hospitalization. Logistic regression, random forest, and gradient boosting algorithms were trained and evaluated using five-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.
resultsAmong the included patients, 37.0% required hospitalization. The random forest model demonstrated the highest predictive performance, with a cross-validation ROC AUC of 0.850 and a test ROC AUC of 0.776. Independent predictors of hospitalization included troponin level, altered mental status, lactate level, age, creatinine, leukocyte count, and pH.
conclusionsMachine learning models, particularly random forest, demonstrated clinically meaningful discriminative performance in predicting hospitalization among critically ill emergency department patients transported by ambulance using early clinical and laboratory data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.