ArticleGenes & nutrition2026
Toward standardized personalized nutrition: a methodological scoping review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in adults with overweight and obesity.
Article in Genes & nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Response of FTO gene polymorphisms to continuous caloric restriction diets on lipid and glycemic biomarkers in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Nutrition & metabolism · 2026Review
- Effects of personalized nutrition on cardiometabolic biomarkers in adults with overweight or obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Nutrition & metabolism · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPersonalized nutrition (PN) interventions are increasingly used to address overweight and obesity, yet randomized controlled trials (RCTs) vary widely in how personalization is defined and delivered. This scoping review synthesized methodological characteristics of PN RCTs in adults with overweight or obesity and meta-analyzed PN effects on anthropometrics. MAIN TEXT: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov through November 20, 2025. Data were extracted using a standardized template capturing intervention characteristics. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted, Bayesian meta-regression was used to explore the effect of intervention duration, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Among the 17 included RCTs, none provided a definition of PN, and substantial methodological heterogeneity was evident. Personalization inputs differed markedly in both number and type, and delivery modes ranged from digital platforms and group sessions to meal-box provision and routine dietitian consultations. PN interventions typically used the same delivery format as their control groups but layered on individualized components, with some providing higher contact frequency. Comparator structures also varied, from standardized guideline-based diets to minimal or no dietary counseling. Personalized diets were produced through algorithmic models, dietitian-guided tailoring, or continuous glucose monitoring-guided participant selection. PN produced a small but significant reduction in body weight, while effects on body mass index (BMI) were non-significant. Longer intervention duration was credibly associated with greater reductions in body weight and BMI. No publication bias was detected, and certainty of evidence was low for body weight and very low for BMI.
conclusionsPN interventions show modest effects on body weight but not BMI, within a highly heterogeneous methodological landscape. This review identifies design features to guide more effective PN interventions. Advancing toward more standardized approaches will require clearer operational definitions of personalization, better-aligned comparator diets, and greater transparency in how personalized strategies are generated and delivered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.