ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Early Imaging Biomarkers of Cartilage Strain After ACL Reconstruction Predict Patient Pain and Altered Knee Loading.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate temporal evolution of cartilage strain and relaxometry following ACL reconstruction, and examine associations between MRI metrics, pain, and knee loading patterns during gait as potential early markers of cartilage degeneration.
methodsTwenty-five participants (15 female, 10 male; mean age 25.6 years) undergoing ACL reconstruction completed MRI assessments at 6 and 12 month post-surgery, including displacement-encoding MRI (intratissue strain) and quantitative relaxometry (T2, T2*, T1ρ). Pain was evaluated using patient-reported outcome scores. Gait analysis quantified knee adduction moment, knee extension moment, and knee flexion moment at 12 months in a subset of patients. Correlations between MRI metrics in cartilage contact regions, patient-reported outcomes, and knee loading were evaluated.
resultsBetween 6 and 12 month post-reconstruction, increased tibial compressive and transverse strains correlated with worsening pain, while increased tibial shear strain associated with reduced pain and improved outcomes. Participants demonstrating greater symptom improvement exhibited higher knee adduction moments, which associated with favorable compositional changes including decreased femoral T1ρ and decreased tibial hydrostatic strain. Higher knee extension moments associated with increased tibial compressive and hydrostatic strain.
conclusionCartilage strain and T1ρ changes associate with pain and altered loading patterns, suggesting potential as early post-traumatic osteoarthritis markers. The observed links between knee loading patterns and cartilage structural changes highlight beneficial adaptation of the reconstructed knee to mechanical loading, and potential avenues for early therapeutic (gait-modifiable) intervention. Advanced MRI may enable early identification of at-risk patients following ACL reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41933250What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.