Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41933213›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2026

Social media users experience more political hostility in less economically equal and less democratic societies.

Alexander Bor, Antoine Marie, Lea Pradella, Michael Bang Petersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexander BorDemocracy Institute, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary. bora@ceu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2624-9221
Antoine MarieCenter for Political Research, Sciences Po, Paris, France.
Lea PradellaDepartment of Political Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Michael Bang PetersenDepartment of Political Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6782-5635

Funding

Carlsbergfondet (Carlsberg Foundation) CF18-1108EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions (H2020 Excellent Science - Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions) 101130870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is widespread concern about the hostility of political discussions on social media, but there is no consensus about the underlying dynamics. In particular, the relationship between online hostility and the broader sociopolitical context has received less attention, in part because of limited research outside Western countries. Here we report results from observational data collected through quota-sampled online surveys in 30 countries across six continents (N = 15,202) about experiences of online hostility. Our findings show that people in less democratic and less economically equal countries experience more hostility online. We also found that, in every country, respondents who are hostile online are also hostile offline and that these people score higher in status-seeking motivations. Exploratory analyses suggest that less democratic societies include more status-motivated individuals and young men-groups showing higher hostility on average. Overall, these findings highlight how online political hostility is intertwined with wider societal tensions.

Indexed as

HostilityPoliticsSocial MediaAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationSocial GroupYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41933213
PMCPMC13290475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.