ArticleHeredity2026
Alternative reproductive strategies explain asymmetries in reproductive isolation and reinforcement in two Ischnura damselfly species.
Article in Heredity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Theoretical and empirical studies of reinforcement have advanced our understanding of speciation, yet its role in polymorphic species remains understudied. Because morphs differ in behavior, morphology, and reproductive strategies, reinforcement may act unevenly among them, generating asymmetric reproductive isolation. We tested this prediction in the polymorphic damselflies Ischnura elegans and Ischnura graellsii, in which female morphs adopt alternative reproductive strategies. These species form two independent hybrid zones where reinforcement has strengthened mechanical isolation and driven reproductive character displacement in mating-related structures. We quantified five reproductive barriers across female morphs to evaluate how color polymorphism interacts with reinforcement. We found clear asymmetry between morphs: gynochrome females of both species showed reinforced mechanical isolation, whereas androchromes did not, consistent with their contrasting reproductive strategies. Additionally, gametic barriers evolved in opposite directions between species. Fertility isolation was reinforced in I. elegans, while oviposition and fertility barriers relaxed in I. graellsii, but symmetrically between female morphs, likely reflecting gene flow and purging of incompatibilities. Reinforcement strengthened reproductive isolation in a morph-specific manner, as pre-existing differences between female morphs influenced the likelihood of heterospecific mating and therefore the strength of selection against hybridization. Future work should examine whether these asymmetric dynamics generate cascading effects within species and contribute to morph-level diversification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.