ArticleScientific reports2026
Revisiting the application of variable infiltration capacity (VIC) model in the Colorado River Basin using SMAP and GRACE.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Colorado River Basin (CRB) is a crucial water supply source experiencing prolonged drought conditions. Hydrologic models of the CRB have historically relied on streamflow calibration alone, limiting confidence in their representation of spatially distributed hydrologic processes. Here, we implemented a calibration and multi-source evaluation framework for the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model using observations from ground snow stations, streamflow records, and NASA's Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) and Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) missions. After model calibration with snow and streamflow records, VIC achieved an excellent streamflow performance at key sub-basin outlets in the CRB (e.g., Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency of 0.96 in the Upper Basin). Independent evaluations with SMAP further revealed a strong model performance in reproducing surface (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.