ArticleScientific reports2026
Proof-of-concept of harvest peak control using a strawberry cultivation emulator with artificial weather chambers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) production requires a precise regulation of harvest-peak timing to meet market demand; however, fruit ripening remains sensitive to environmental fluctuations. We developed a peak-shift control system using a maturation simulator and conducted a proof-of-concept trial in climate chambers reproducing greenhouse conditions. Two control scenarios were designed: delayed flowering, wherein the predicted peaks lagged by a week and were corrected using heating offsets, and premature flowering, wherein the peaks advanced by a week and were adjusted using cooling offsets. Temperature offsets were explored within ± 5 °C, updated approximately twice weekly, to converge the predicted peaks with the target date on December 21, 2019. Results demonstrated successful alignment within ± 1 day in three of four treatments, surpassing previously reported prediction models. Cooling and heating treatments broadened and shortened harvest distributions by 2-3 and 2-4 days, respectively, suggesting the potential for balancing yield concentration. Post-harvest evaluation revealed no significant differences in morphology, grade distribution, or class proportion, although heating significantly reduced the soluble solid content, indicating a trade-off between accelerated ripening and sweetness. To our knowledge, this study provides the first experimental demonstration of simulation-in-the-loop, proactive harvest-peak control in strawberry, forming a basis for digital-twin-based cultivation control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.